Artificial intelligence differentiates prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis with thrombocytosis from essential thrombocythemia using digitized bone marrow biopsy images

Barosi G, Mesa RA, Thiele J, Cervantes F, Campbell PJ, Verstovsek S, et al. Proposed criteria for the diagnosis of post-polycythemia vera and post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis: a consensus statement from the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Leukemia. 2008;22:437–8.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Thiele J, Georgii A, Vykoupil KF. Ultrastructure of chronic megakaryocytic-granulocytic myelosis. Blut. 1976;32:433–8.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002;100:2292–302.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009;114:937–51.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1703–19.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Rumi E, Boveri E, Bellini M, Pietra D, Ferretti VV, Sant’Antonio E, et al. Clinical course and outcome of essential thrombocythemia and prefibrotic myelofibrosis according to the revised WHO 2016 diagnostic criteria. Oncotarget. 2017;8:101735–44.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, Rumi E, Boveri E, Ruggeri M, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3179–84.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Guglielmelli P, Pacilli A, Rotunno G, Rumi E, Rosti V, Delaini F, et al. Presentation and outcome of patients with 2016 WHO diagnosis of prefibrotic and overt primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2017;129:3227–36.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Gisslinger H, Jeryczynski G, Gisslinger B, Wolfler A, Burgstaller S, Buxhofer-Ausch V, et al. Clinical impact of bone marrow morphology for the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia: comparison between the BCSH and the WHO criteria. Leukemia. 2016;30:1126–32.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Finazzi G, Carobbio A, Thiele J, Passamonti F, Rumi E, Ruggeri M, et al. Incidence and risk factors for bleeding in 1104 patients with essential thrombocythemia or prefibrotic myelofibrosis diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO criteria. Leukemia. 2012;26:716–9.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Passamonti F, Rumi E, Arcaini L, Boveri E, Elena C, Pietra D, et al. Prognostic factors for thrombosis, myelofibrosis, and leukemia in essential thrombocythemia: a study of 605 patients. Haematologica. 2008;93:1645–51.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, Borowitz MJ, Calvo KR, Kvasnicka HM, et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140:1200–28.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Madelung AB, Bondo H, Stamp I, Lovgreen P, Nielsen SL, Falensteen A, et al. WHO classification 2008 of myeloproliferative neoplasms: a workshop learning effect-the Danish experience. APMIS. 2015;123:787–92.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Mullauer L, Buxhofer-Ausch V, Gisslinger B, Gisslinger H. Essential thrombocythemia versus early primary myelofibrosis: a multicenter study to validate the WHO classification. Blood. 2011;117:5710–8.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Srisuwananukorn A, Salama ME, Pearson AT. Deep learning applications in visual data for benign and malignant hematologic conditions: a systematic review and visual glossary. Haematologica. 2023;108:1993–2010.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Srisuwananukorn A, Krull JE, Ma Q, Zhang P, Pearson AT, Hoffman R. Applications of artificial intelligence to myeloproliferative neoplasms: a narrative review. Expert Rev Hematol. 2024;17:1–9.

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2015 1026–34 https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2015.123.

Perez-Lopez R, Ghaffari Laleh N, Mahmood F, Kather JN. A guide to artificial intelligence for cancer researchers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2024;24:427–41.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Rashidi HH, Pantanowitz J, Chamanzar A, Fennell B, Wang Y, Gullapalli RR, et al. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Pathology and Medicine: A Deeper Dive. Mod Pathol. 2025;38:100687.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Campanella G, Chen S, Singh M, Verma R, Muehlstedt S, Zeng J, et al. A clinical benchmark of public self-supervised pathology foundation models. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3640.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Ryou H, Sirinukunwattana K, Aberdeen A, Grindstaff G, Stolz BJ, Byrne H, et al. Continuous Indexing of Fibrosis (CIF): improving the assessment and classification of MPN patients. Leukemia. 2023;37:348–58.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Dolezal JM, Wolk R, Hieromnimon HM, Howard FM, Srisuwananukorn A, Karpeyev D, et al. Deep Learning Generates Synthetic Cancer Histology for Explainability and Education, 2022 November 01, 2022:[arXiv:2211.06522 p.]. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv221106522D.

Hieromnimon HM, Dolezal J, Doytcheva K, Howard FM, Kochanny S, Zhang Z, et al. Building digital histology models of transcriptional tumor programs with generative deep learning for pathology-based precision medicine. Genome Medicine. 2025;4:38.

Google Scholar 

Hieromnimon HM, Trzcinska A, Wen FT, Howard FM, Dolezal JM, Dyer E, et al. Analysis of AI foundation model features decodes the histopathologic landscape of HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oral Oncol. 2025;163:107207.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Dolezal JM, Kochanny S, Dyer E, Ramesh S, Srisuwananukorn A, Sacco M, et al. Slideflow: deep learning for digital histopathology with real-time whole-slide visualization. BMC Bioinformatics. 2024;25:134.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Center OS. Ohio Supercomputer Center. Ohio Supercomputer Center; 1987.

Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2020;2:e200029.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, Ma J, Hooft L, Reitsma JB, et al. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e048008.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Wang X, Du Y, Yang S, Zhang J, Wang M, Zhang J, et al. RetCCL: Clustering-guided contrastive learning for whole-slide image retrieval. Med Image Anal. 2023;83:102645.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Ilse M, Tomczak J, Welling M. Attention-based deep multiple instance learning. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning; 10-15 July 2018; Stockholm, Sweden: PMLR; 2018;80:2127–36.

Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16878.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Palomaki VA, Koivukangas V, Merilainen S, Lehenkari P, Karttunen TJ. A Straightforward Method for Adipocyte Size and Count Analysis Using Open-source Software QuPath. Adipocyte. 2022;11:99–107.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Dolezal JM, Srisuwananukorn A, Karpeyev D, Ramesh S, Kochanny S, Cody B, et al. Uncertainty-Informed Deep Learning Models Enable High-Confidence Predictions for Digital Histopathology. Nature Communications 2022;13:6572.

Barbui T, Thiele J, Vannucchi AM, Tefferi A. Problems and pitfalls regarding WHO-defined diagnosis of early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis versus essential thrombocythemia. Leukemia. 2013;27:1953–8.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Carobbio A, Finazzi G, Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Passamonti F, Rumi E, et al. Blood tests may predict early primary myelofibrosis in patients presenting with essential thrombocythemia. Am J Hematol. 2012;87:203–4.

Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Schalling M, Gleiss A, Gisslinger B, Wolfler A, Buxhofer-Ausch V, Jeryczynski G, et al. Essential thrombocythemia vs. pre-fibrotic/early primary myelofibrosis: discrimination by laboratory and clinical data. Blood Cancer J. 2017;7:643.

Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Lekovic D, Bogdanovic A, Sobas M, Arsenovic I, Smiljanic M, Ivanovic J, et al. Easily Applicable Predictive Score for Differential Diagnosis of Prefibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis from Essential Thrombocythemia. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:4180.

Harrison CN, Campbell PJ, Buck G, Wheatley K, East CL, Bareford D, et al. Hydroxyurea compared with anagrelide in high-risk essential thrombocythemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:33–45.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Rozman C, Cervantes F, Rozman M, Mercader JM, Montserrat E. Magnetic resonance imaging in myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythaemia: contribution to differential diagnosis. Br J Haematol. 1999;104:574–80.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lu M, Xia L, Liu YC, Hochman T, Bizzari L, Aruch D, et al. Lipocalin produced by myelofibrosis cells affects the fate of both hematopoietic and marrow microenvironmental cells. Blood. 2015;126:972–82.

Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar