Nowell, P. C. The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations: acquired genetic lability permits stepwise selection of variant sublines and underlies tumor progression. Science 194, 23–28 (1976).
Google Scholar
Ciriello, G. et al. Cancer evolution: a multifaceted affair. Cancer Discov. 14, 36–48 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rockweiler, N. B. et al. The origins and functional effects of postzygotic mutations throughout the human life span. Science 380, eabn7113 (2023).
Google Scholar
Jonason, A. S. et al. Frequent clones of p53-mutated keratinocytes in normal human skin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14025–14029 (1996).
Google Scholar
Martincorena, I. et al. High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin. Science 348, 880–886 (2015). This article identified somatic variants in cancer driver genes that were positively selected in the normal skin, in which a quarter of cells that carried cancer-causing mutations and mutation burdens in some cells were as high as those in tumours.
Google Scholar
Lee-Six, H. et al. The landscape of somatic mutation in normal colorectal epithelial cells. Nature 574, 532–537 (2019).
Google Scholar
Martincorena, I. et al. Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age. Science 362, 911–917 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, K. et al. Tobacco smoking and somatic mutations in human bronchial epithelium. Nature 578, 266–272 (2020).
Google Scholar
Moore, L. et al. The mutational landscape of normal human endometrial epithelium. Nature 580, 640–646 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lawson, A. R. J. et al. Extensive heterogeneity in somatic mutation and selection in the human bladder. Science 370, 75–82 (2020).
Google Scholar
Coorens, T. H. H. et al. The somatic mutation landscape of normal gastric epithelium. Nature 640, 418–426 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, S. et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2488–2498 (2014).
Google Scholar
Busque, L. et al. Recurrent somatic TET2 mutations in normal elderly individuals with clonal hematopoiesis. Nat. Genet. 44, 1179–1181 (2012).
Google Scholar
Genovese, G. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 2477–2487 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jaiswal, S. et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 111–121 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xie, H. et al. Age-related mutations associated with clonal hematopoietic expansion and malignancies. Nat. Med. 12, 1472–1478 (2014).
Google Scholar
Abelson, S. et al. Prediction of acute myeloid leukaemia risk in healthy individuals. Nature 559, 400–404 (2018).
Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. et al. Clonal dynamics of haematopoiesis across the human lifespan. Nature 606, 343–350 (2022).
Google Scholar
Williams, M. J. et al. Quantification of subclonal selection in cancer from bulk sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 50, 895–903 (2018).
Google Scholar
Williams, M. J., Sottoriva, A. & Graham, T. A. Measuring clonal evolution in cancer with genomics. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 20, 309–329 (2019).
Google Scholar
El-Kebir, M., Satas, G., Oesper, L. & Raphael, B. J. Inferring the mutational history of a tumor using multi-state perfect phylogeny mixtures. Cell Syst. 3, 43–53 (2016).
Google Scholar
Attolini, C. S.-O. et al. A mathematical framework to determine the temporal sequence of somatic genetic events in cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17604–17609 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gerlinger, M. et al. Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing. Nat. Genet. 46, 225–233 (2014). Seminal work on intratumoural heterogeneity demonstrating that single-region biopsies frequently miss spatially distinct subclones.
Google Scholar
Tarabichi, M. et al. A practical guide to cancer subclonal reconstruction from DNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 18, 144–155 (2021).
Google Scholar
Olafsson, S. et al. Somatic evolution in non-neoplastic IBD-affected colon. Cell 182, 672–684.e11 (2020).
Google Scholar
Navin, N. et al. Tumour evolution inferred by single-cell sequencing. Nature 472, 90–94 (2011). First tumour phylogeny built from single-cell sequencing data.
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Clonal evolution in breast cancer revealed by single nucleus genome sequencing. Nature 512, 155–160 (2014).
Google Scholar
Abdellaoui, A., Yengo, L., Verweij, K. J. H. & Visscher, P. M. 15 years of GWAS discovery: realizing the promise. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 110, 179–194 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nam, A. S. et al. Somatic mutations and cell identity linked by genotyping of transcriptomes. Nature 571, 355–360 (2019). Demonstrated that cell-type-specific effects of somatic mutations could be identified, opening up the possibility of selectively targeting mutant cell populations in a lineage of interest (that is, stem cells).
Google Scholar
Nam, A. S. et al. Single-cell multi-omics of human clonal hematopoiesis reveals that DNMT3A R882 mutations perturb early progenitor states through selective hypomethylation. Nat. Genet. 54, 1514–1526 (2022).
Google Scholar
Cortés-López, M. et al. Single-cell multi-omics defines the cell-type-specific impact of splicing aberrations in human hematopoietic clonal outgrowths. Cell Stem Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2023.07.012 (2023).
Google Scholar
Izzo, F. et al. Mapping genotypes to chromatin accessibility profiles in single cells. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07388-y (2024).
Google Scholar
Macaulay, I. C. et al. G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes. Nat. Methods 12, 519–522 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dey, S. S., Kester, L., Spanjaard, B., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Integrated genome and transcriptome sequencing of the same cell. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 285–289 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhakula-Kostadinova, N. & Taylor, A. M. Patterns of aneuploidy and signaling consequences in cancer. Cancer Res. 84, 2575–2587 (2024).
Google Scholar
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689.e3 (2018).
Google Scholar
Gerlinger, M. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 883–892 (2012).
Google Scholar
van Galen, P. et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals AML hierarchies relevant to disease progression and immunity. Cell 176, 1265–1281.e24 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Meira, A. et al. Unravelling intratumoral heterogeneity through high-sensitivity single-cell mutational analysis and parallel RNA sequencing. Mol. Cell 73, 1292–1305.e8 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bellani, V., Mora, B., Iurlo, A. & Passamonti, F. CALR-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leuk. Lymphoma https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2465551 (2025).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, M. & Zhang, J. New advances in the role of JAK2 V617F mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cancer 130, 4229–4240 (2024).
Google Scholar
Spivak, J. L. Myeloproliferative neoplasms. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2168–2181 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yoshida, H., Matsui, T., Yamamoto, A., Okada, T. & Mori, K. XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor. Cell 107, 881–891 (2001).
Google Scholar
Kralovics, R. et al. A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1779–1790 (2005).
Google Scholar
James, C. et al. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature 434, 1144–1148 (2005).
Google Scholar
Baxter, E. J. et al. Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders. Lancet 365, 1054–1061 (2005).
Google Scholar
Turkalj, S. et al. GTAC enables parallel genotyping of multiple genomic loci with chromatin accessibility profiling in single cells. Cell Stem Cell 30, 722–740.e11 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ciurea, S. O. et al. Pivotal contributions of megakaryocytes to the biology of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Blood 110, 986–993 (2007).
Google Scholar
Petti, A. A. et al. A general approach for detecting expressed mutations in AML cells using single cell RNA-sequencing. Nat. Commun. 10, 3660 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Meira, A. et al. Single-cell multi-omics identifies chronic inflammation as a driver of TP53-mutant leukemic evolution. Nat. Genet. 55, 1531–1541 (2023).
Google Scholar
Beneyto-Calabuig, S. et al. Clonally resolved single-cell multi-omics identifies routes of cellular differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 30, 706–721.e8 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sango, J. et al. RAS-mutant leukaemia stem cells drive clinical resistance to venetoclax. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08137-x (2024).
Google Scholar
Sirenko, M. et al. Deconvoluting clonal and cellular architecture in IDH-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell 32, 1102–1121.e5 (2025).
Google Scholar
Miles, L. A. et al. Single-cell mutation analysis of clonal evolution in myeloid malignancies. Nature 587, 477–482 (2020).
Google Scholar
Izzo, F. et al. DNA methylation disruption reshapes the hematopoietic differentiation landscape. Nat. Genet. 52, 378–387 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chkhaidze, K. et al. Spatially constrained tumour growth affects the patterns of clonal selection and neutral drift in cancer genomic data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007243 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jiménez-Gracia, L. et al. FixNCut: single-cell genomics through reversible tissue fixation and dissociation. Genom. Biol. 25, 81 (2024).
Google Scholar
Denisenko, E. et al. Systematic assessment of tissue dissociation and storage biases in single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq workflows. Genom. Biol. 21, 130 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hou, Y. et al. Single-cell triple omics sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell Res. 26, 304–319 (2016).
Google Scholar
Shi, H. et al. Allele-specific transcriptional effects of subclonal copy number alterations enable genotype–phenotype mapping in cancer cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 2482 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yu, L. et al. scONE-seq: a single-cell multi-omics method enables simultaneous dissection of phenotype and genotype heterogeneity from frozen tumors. Sci. Adv. 9, eabp8901 (2023).
Google Scholar
Olsen, T. R. et al. Scalable co-sequencing of RNA and DNA from individual nuclei. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02579-x (2025).
Google Scholar
Lee-Six, H. et al. Population dynamics of normal human blood inferred from somatic mutations. Nature 561, 473–478 (2018). First phylogenetic and phylodynamics study of healthy human primary single-cell colonies.
Google Scholar
Potten, C. S., Kellett, M., Roberts, S. A., Rew, D. A. & Wilson, G. D. Measurement of in vivo proliferation in human colorectal mucosa using bromodeoxyuridine. Gut 33, 71–78 (1992).
Google Scholar
Lopez-Garcia, C., Klein, A. M., Simons, B. D. & Winton, D. J. Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330, 822–825 (2010).
Google Scholar
Snippert, H. J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
Google Scholar
Househam, J. et al. Phenotypic plasticity and genetic control in colorectal cancer evolution. Nature 611, 744–753 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sottoriva, A. et al. A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth. Nat. Genet. 47, 209–216 (2015). The authors proposed that colorectal tumours grow as a single early expansion, with most subclonal diversity arising at the onset of tumour growth rather than through later selective sweeps.
Google Scholar
Cross, W. et al. The evolutionary landscape of colorectal tumorigenesis. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1661–1672 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. et al. Coalescing single-cell genomes and transcriptomes to decode breast cancer progression. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.08.012 (2025).
Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, A. et al. Transcriptional effects of copy number alterations in a large set of human cancers. Nat. Commun. 11, 715 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lakatos, E. et al. Epigenetically driven and early immune evasion in colorectal cancer evolution. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02349-1 (2025).
Google Scholar
Neftel, C. et al. An integrative model of cellular states, plasticity, and genetics for glioblastoma. Cell 178, 835–849.e21 (2019). Identified four recurrent plastic cellular states in glioblastoma whose relative abundance is modulated by genetic aberrations.
Google Scholar
Hara, T. et al. Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 39, 779–792.e11 (2021).
Google Scholar
Casasent, A. K. et al. Multiclonal invasion in breast tumors identified by topographic single. Cell Seq. Cell 172, 205–217.e12 (2018).
Google Scholar
Erickson, A. et al. Spatially resolved clonal copy number alterations in benign and malignant tissue. Nature 608, 360–367 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lomakin, A. et al. Spatial genomics maps the structure, nature and evolution of cancer clones. Nature 611, 594–602 (2022).
Google Scholar
Engblom, C. et al. Spatial transcriptomics of B cell and T cell receptors reveals lymphocyte clonal dynamics. Science 382, eadf8486 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, T. et al. Spatial genomics enables multi-modal study of clonal heterogeneity in tissues. Nature 601, 85–91 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lawson, A. R. J. et al. Somatic mutation and selection at population scale. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09584-w (2025).
Google Scholar
Yokoyama, A. et al. Age-related remodelling of oesophageal epithelia by mutated cancer drivers. Nature 565, 312–317 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lin, Y. et al. Normal breast tissues harbour rare populations of aneuploid epithelial cells. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08129-x (2024).
Google Scholar
Williams, M. J. et al. Luminal breast epithelial cells of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and noncarriers harbor common breast cancer copy number alterations. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01988-0 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yuan, D. J. et al. Genotype-to-phenotype mapping of somatic clonal mosaicism via single-cell co-capture of DNA mutations and mRNA transcripts. Cancer Discov. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-24-0853 (2025).
Google Scholar
Jakobsen, N. A. et al. Selective advantage of mutant stem cells in human clonal hematopoiesis is associated with attenuated response to inflammation and aging. Cell Stem Cell 31, 1127–1144.e17 (2024).
Google Scholar
Knudson, A. G. Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 68, 820–823 (1971).
Google Scholar
Tall, A. R. & Fuster, J. J. Clonal hematopoiesis in cardiovascular disease and therapeutic implications. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 1, 116–124 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brunner, S. F. et al. Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver. Nature 574, 538–542 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ng, S. W. K. et al. Convergent somatic mutations in metabolism genes in chronic liver disease. Nature 598, 473–478 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kakiuchi, N. et al. Frequent mutations that converge on the NFKBIZ pathway in ulcerative colitis. Nature 577, 260–265 (2019).
Google Scholar
Desai, P. et al. Somatic mutations precede acute myeloid leukemia years before diagnosis. Nat. Med. 24, 1015–1023 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nelson, M. R. et al. The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications. Nat. Genet. 47, 856–860 (2015).
Google Scholar
Minikel, E. V., Painter, J. L., Dong, C. C. & Nelson, M. R. Refining the impact of genetic evidence on clinical success. Nature 629, 624–629 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pardanani, A. & Tefferi, A. Definition and management of ruxolitinib treatment failure in myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J. 4, e268 (2014).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. Integrated analysis of patient samples identifies biomarkers for venetoclax efficacy and combination strategies in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Cancer 1, 826–839 (2020).
Google Scholar
Bewersdorf, J. P. et al. Venetoclax-based combinations in AML and high-risk MDS prior to and following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Leuk. Lymphoma 62, 3394–3401 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, M., Demo, S. D., McClure, T. N., Crea, R. & Bitler, C. M. A novel splice variant of the cell death-promoting protein BAX. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11930–11936 (1998).
Google Scholar
Beck, D. B. et al. Somatic mutations in UBA1 and severe adult-onset autoinflammatory disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 2628–2638 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ganesan, S. et al. Single-cell genotype–phenotype mapping identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities in VEXAS syndrome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.19.594376 (2024).
Yamini, B. NF-κB, mesenchymal differentiation and glioblastoma. Cells 7, E125 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yi, L. et al. IKBKE, a prognostic factor preferentially expressed in mesenchymal glioblastoma, modulates tumoral immunosuppression through the STAT3/PD-L1 pathway. Clin. Transl. Med. 10, e130 (2020).
Google Scholar
Stadler, T., Pybus, O. G. & Stumpf, M. P. H. Phylodynamics for cell biologists. Science 371, eaah6266 (2021).
Google Scholar
Schiffman, J. S. et al. Defining heritability, plasticity, and transition dynamics of cellular phenotypes in somatic evolution. Nat. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01920-6 (2024). Developed a framework based on phylogenetic signal that decouples genetic heritability from non-genetic plasticity.
Google Scholar
Ansari, M. A. & Didelot, X. Bayesian inference of the evolution of a phenotype distribution on a phylogenetic tree. Genetics 204, 89–98 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cortés-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).
Google Scholar
Mazzagatti, A., Engel, J. L. & Ly, P. Boveri and beyond: chromothripsis and genomic instability from mitotic errors. Mol. Cell 84, 55–69 (2024).
Google Scholar
Minussi, D. C. et al. Breast tumours maintain a reservoir of subclonal diversity during expansion. Nature 592, 302–308 (2021).
Google Scholar
Laks, E. et al. Clonal decomposition and DNA replication states defined by scaled single-cell genome sequencing. Cell 179, 1207–1221.e22 (2019).
Google Scholar
Funnell, T. et al. Single-cell genomic variation induced by mutational processes in cancer. Nature 612, 106–115 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kaufmann, T. L. et al. MEDICC2: whole-genome doubling aware copy-number phylogenies for cancer evolution. Genom. Biol. 23, 241 (2022).
Google Scholar
Watkins, T. B. K. et al. Pervasive chromosomal instability and karyotype order in tumour evolution. Nature 587, 126–132 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kang, E. et al. Age-related accumulation of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in adult-derived human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 18, 625–636 (2016).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. Somatic point mutations occurring early in development: a monozygotic twin study. J. Med. Genet. 51, 28–34 (2014).
Google Scholar
Robin, E. D. & Wong, R. Mitochondrial DNA molecules and virtual number of mitochondria per cell in mammalian cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 136, 507–513 (1988).
Google Scholar
Zhang, P. et al. Estimating relative mitochondrial DNA copy number using high throughput sequencing data. Genomics 109, 457–462 (2017).
Google Scholar
Xu, J. et al. Single-cell lineage tracing by endogenous mutations enriched in transposase accessible mitochondrial DNA. eLife 8, e45105 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ludwig, L. S. et al. Lineage tracing in humans enabled by mitochondrial mutations and single-cell genomics. Cell 176, 1325–1339.e22 (2019).
Google Scholar
Velten, L. et al. Identification of leukemic and pre-leukemic stem cells by clonal tracking from single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Commun. 12, 1366 (2021).
Google Scholar
Penter, L. et al. Longitudinal single-cell dynamics of chromatin accessibility and mitochondrial mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia mirror disease history. Cancer Discov. 11, 3048–3063 (2021).
Google Scholar
Weng, C. et al. Deciphering cell states and genealogies of human haematopoiesis. Nature 627, 389–398 (2024).
Google Scholar
An, J. et al. Mitochondrial DNA mosaicism in normal human somatic cells. Nat. Genet. 56, 1665–1677 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lareau, C. A. et al. Artifacts in single-cell mitochondrial DNA mutation analyses misinform phylogenetic inference. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.28.605517 (2024).
Nitsch, L., Lareau, C. A. & Ludwig, L. S. Mitochondrial genetics through the lens of single-cell multi-omics. Nat. Genet. 56, 1355–1365 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hile, S. E. & Eckert, K. A. DNA polymerase kappa produces interrupted mutations and displays polar pausing within mononucleotide microsatellite sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 688–696 (2008).
Google Scholar
Hause, R. J., Pritchard, C. C., Shendure, J. & Salipante, S. J. Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types. Nat. Med. 22, 1342–1350 (2016).
Google Scholar
Tao, L. et al. Retrospective cell lineage reconstruction in humans by using short tandem repeats. Cell Rep. Methods 1, None (2021).
Google Scholar
Willems, T. et al. Genome-wide profiling of heritable and de novo STR variations. Nat. Methods 14, 590–592 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wei, C. J.-Y. & Zhang, K. RETrace: simultaneous retrospective lineage tracing and methylation profiling of single cells. Genom. Res. 30, 602–610 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ushijima, T. et al. Fidelity of the methylation pattern and its variation in the genome. Genom. Res. 13, 868–874 (2003).
Google Scholar
Zhou, W. & Reizel, Y. On correlative and causal links of replicative epimutations. Trends Genet. 41, 60–75 (2025).
Google Scholar
Gaiti, F. et al. Epigenetic evolution and lineage histories of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature 569, 576–580 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hudson, R. R. & Kaplan, N. L. Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111, 147–164 (1985).
Google Scholar
Chaligne, R. et al. Epigenetic encoding, heritability and plasticity of glioma transcriptional cell states. Nat. Genet. 53, 1469–1479 (2021).
Google Scholar
Scherer, M. et al. Clonal tracing with somatic epimutations reveals dynamics of blood ageing. Nature 643, 478–487 (2025).
Google Scholar
Spencer Chapman, M. et al. Prolonged persistence of mutagenic DNA lesions in somatic cells. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08423-8 (2025).
Google Scholar
Acar, A. et al. Exploiting evolutionary steering to induce collateral drug sensitivity in cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 1923 (2020).
Google Scholar
Brody, Y. et al. Quantification of somatic mutation flow across individual cell division events by lineage sequencing. Genom. Res. 28, 1901–1918 (2018).
Google Scholar
Potter, N. E. et al. Single-cell mutational profiling and clonal phylogeny in cancer. Genom. Res. 23, 2115–2125 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gawad, C., Koh, W. & Quake, S. R. Dissecting the clonal origins of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by single-cell genomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17947–17952 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leung, M. L. et al. Single-cell DNA sequencing reveals a late-dissemination model in metastatic colorectal cancer. Genom. Res. 27, 1287–1299 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zafar, H., Tzen, A., Navin, N., Chen, K. & Nakhleh, L. SiFit: inferring tumor trees from single-cell sequencing data under finite-sites models. Genom. Biol. 18, 178 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kozlov, A., Alves, J. M., Stamatakis, A. & Posada, D. CellPhy: accurate and fast probabilistic inference of single-cell phylogenies from scDNA-seq data. Genom. Biol. 23, 37 (2022).
Google Scholar
Williams, N. et al. Life histories of myeloproliferative neoplasms inferred from phylogenies. Nature 602, 162–168 (2022). Developed relevant methodology for single-cell phylogeny calibration under a non-strict model.
Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Pena, V. et al. Accurate genomic variant detection in single cells with primary template-directed amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024176118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Luquette, L. J. et al. Single-cell genome sequencing of human neurons identifies somatic point mutation and indel enrichment in regulatory elements. Nat. Genet. 54, 1564–1571 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ganz, J. et al. Contrasting somatic mutation patterns in aging human neurons and oligodendrocytes. Cell 187, 1955–1970.e23 (2024).
Google Scholar
Poort, V. M. et al. Transient differentiation-state plasticity occurs during acute lymphoblastic leukemia initiation. Cancer Res. 84, 2720–2733 (2024).
Google Scholar
Uchimura, A. et al. Early embryonic mutations reveal dynamics of somatic and germ cell lineages in mice. Genom. Res. 32, 945–955 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ye, A. Y. et al. A model for postzygotic mosaicisms quantifies the allele fraction drift, mutation rate, and contribution to de novo mutations. Genom. Res. 28, 943–951 (2018).
Google Scholar
Coorens, T. H. H. et al. Extensive phylogenies of human development inferred from somatic mutations. Nature 597, 387–392 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lodato, M. A. et al. Somatic mutation in single human neurons tracks developmental and transcriptional history. Science 350, 94–98 (2015).
Google Scholar
Spencer Chapman, M. et al. Clonal dynamics after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Nature 635, 926–934 (2024).
Google Scholar
Van Egeren, D. et al. Reconstructing the lineage histories and differentiation trajectories of individual cancer cells in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Cell Stem Cell 28, 514–523.e9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2.5: an advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, K., Moravec, J. C., Gavryushkin, A., Welch, D. & Drummond, A. J. Accounting for errors in data improves divergence time estimates in single-cell cancer evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 39, msac143 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, L. et al. A mouse model with high clonal barcode diversity for joint lineage, transcriptomic, and epigenomic profiling in single cells. Cell 186, 5183–5199.e22 (2023).
Google Scholar
Bowling, S. et al. An engineered CRISPR–Cas9 mouse line for simultaneous readout of lineage histories and gene expression profiles in single cells. Cell 181, 1410–1422.e27 (2020).
Google Scholar
Weinreb, C., Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A., Camargo, F. D. & Klein, A. M. Lineage tracing on transcriptional landscapes links state to fate during differentiation. Science 367, eaaw3381 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chung, C. et al. Cell-type-resolved mosaicism reveals clonal dynamics of the human forebrain. Nature 629, 384–392 (2024).
Google Scholar
Prieto, T. et al. Large-scale single-cell phylogenetic mapping of clonal evolution in the human aging esophagus. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.11.681805 (2025).
Sulston, J. E., Schierenberg, E., White, J. G. & Thomson, J. N. The embryonic cell lineage of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 100, 64–119 (1983).
Google Scholar
Hanahan, D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 12, 31–46 (2022).
Google Scholar
Laisné, M., Lupien, M. & Vallot, C. Epigenomic heterogeneity as a source of tumour evolution. Nat. Rev. Cancer 25, 7–26 (2025).
Google Scholar
Gavish, A. et al. Hallmarks of transcriptional intratumour heterogeneity across a thousand tumours. Nature 618, 598–606 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kinker, G. S. et al. Pan-cancer single-cell RNA-seq identifies recurring programs of cellular heterogeneity. Nat. Genet. 52, 1208–1218 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shaffer, S. M. et al. Rare cell variability and drug-induced reprogramming as a mode of cancer drug resistance. Nature 546, 431–435 (2017).
Google Scholar
Su, Y. et al. Single-cell analysis resolves the cell state transition and signaling dynamics associated with melanoma drug-induced resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13679–13684 (2017).
Google Scholar
Takao, S. et al. Epigenetic mechanisms controlling human leukemia stem cells and therapy resistance. Nat. Commun. 16, 3196 (2025).
Google Scholar
Fennell, K. A. et al. Non-genetic determinants of malignant clonal fitness at single-cell resolution. Nature 601, 125–131 (2021).
Google Scholar
Oliveira, E. A. et al. Epigenetic heritability of cell plasticity drives cancer drug resistance through a one-to-many genotype-to-phenotype paradigm. Cancer Res. 85, 2921–2938 (2025).
Google Scholar
Moghal, N. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptomic features of drug-tolerant persisters and stromal adaptation in a patient-derived EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma xenograft model. J. Thorac. Oncol. 18, 499–515 (2023).
Google Scholar
Goyal, Y. et al. Diverse clonal fates emerge upon drug treatment of homogeneous cancer cells. Nature 620, 651–659 (2023).
Google Scholar
Suter, D. M. et al. Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics. Science 332, 472–474 (2011).
Google Scholar
Gamble, N. et al. Thymic epithelial cells amplify epigenetic noise to promote immune tolerance. Nature 646, 724–733 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yang, J.-H. et al. Loss of epigenetic information as a cause of mammalian aging. Cell 186, 305–326.e27 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hunter, M. V. et al. Mechanical confinement governs phenotypic plasticity in melanoma. Nature 647, 517–527 (2025).
Google Scholar
Whiting, F. J. H., Househam, J., Baker, A.-M., Sottoriva, A. & Graham, T. A. Phenotypic noise and plasticity in cancer evolution. Trends Cell Biol. 34, 451–464 (2024).
Google Scholar
Damaghi, M. et al. The harsh microenvironment in early breast cancer selects for a Warburg phenotype. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2011342118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Quinn, J. J. et al. Single-cell lineages reveal the rates, routes, and drivers of metastasis in cancer xenografts. Science 371, eabc1944 (2021).
Google Scholar
Spitzer, A. et al. Mutant IDH inhibitors induce lineage differentiation in IDH-mutant oligodendroglioma. Cancer Cell 42, 904–914.e9 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mzoughi, S. et al. Oncofetal reprogramming drives phenotypic plasticity in WNT-dependent colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 57, 402–412 (2025).
Google Scholar
Challen, G. A. et al. Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b have overlapping and distinct functions in hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 15, 350–364 (2014).
Google Scholar
Levine, R. L. et al. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell 7, 387–397 (2005).
Google Scholar
Maddison, W. P., Midford, P. E. & Otto, S. P. Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Syst. Biol. 56, 701–710 (2007).
Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125, 1–15 (1985).
Google Scholar
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).
Google Scholar
Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).
Google Scholar
Jones, M. G., Rosen, Y. & Yosef, N. Interactive, integrated analysis of single-cell transcriptomic and phylogenetic data with PhyloVision. Cell Rep Methods 2, 100200 (2022).
Google Scholar
DeTomaso, D. & Yosef, N. Hotspot identifies informative gene modules across modalities of single-cell genomics. Cell Syst. 12, 446–456.e9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Richman, L. P., Goyal, Y., Jiang, C. L. & Raj, A. ClonoCluster: a method for using clonal origin to inform transcriptome clustering. Cell Genom. 3, 100247 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, D. et al. Lineage tracing reveals the phylodynamics, plasticity, and paths of tumor evolution. Cell 185, 1905–1923.e25 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gittleman, J. L. & Kot, M. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Biol. 39, 227–241 (1990).
Simeonov, K. P. et al. Single-cell lineage tracing of metastatic cancer reveals selection of hybrid EMT states. Cancer Cell 39, 1150–1162.e9 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, S.-W., Herriges, M. J., Hurley, K., Kotton, D. N. & Klein, A. M. CoSpar identifies early cell fate biases from single-cell transcriptomic and lineage information. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1066–1074 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fang, W. et al. Quantitative fate mapping: a general framework for analyzing progenitor state dynamics via retrospective lineage barcoding. Cell 185, 4604–4620.e32 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bartosovic, M., Kabbe, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Single-cell CUT&Tag profiles histone modifications and transcription factors in complex tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 825–835 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bartosovic, M. & Castelo-Branco, G. Multimodal chromatin profiling using nanobody-based single-cell CUT&Tag. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 794–805 (2023).
Google Scholar
Stuart, T. et al. Nanobody-tethered transposition enables multifactorial chromatin profiling at single-cell resolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 806–812 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chi, W.-Y. et al. Single-cell mapping of regulatory DNA:Protein interactions. Cell. 12, 3801-3816 (2025).
Shain, A. H. & Pollack, J. R. The spectrum of SWI/SNF mutations, ubiquitous in human cancers. PLoS ONE 8, e55119 (2013).
Google Scholar
Colom, B. et al. Mutant clones in normal epithelium outcompete and eliminate emerging tumours. Nature 598, 510–514 (2021).
Google Scholar
Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181 (2014).
Google Scholar
Han, K. Y. et al. SIDR: simultaneous isolation and parallel sequencing of genomic DNA and total RNA from single cells. Genom. Res. 28, 75–87 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yin, Y. et al. High-throughput single-cell sequencing with linear amplification. Mol. Cell 76, 676–690.e10 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zachariadis, V., Cheng, H., Andrews, N. & Enge, M. A highly scalable method for joint whole-genome sequencing and gene-expression profiling of single cells. Mol. Cell 80, 541–553.e5 (2020).
Google Scholar
Marks, J. R. et al. Unifying comprehensive genomics and transcriptomics in individual cells to illuminate oncogenic and drug resistance mechanisms. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.29.489440 (2023).
Lindenhofer, D. et al. Functional phenotyping of genomic variants using joint multiomic single-cell DNA–RNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 22, 2032–2041 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, S. et al. Hybrid BAG-seq: DNA and RNA from the same single nucleus reveals interactions between genomic and transcriptomic landscapes in human tumor samples. Genom. Biol. 26, 314 (2025).
Google Scholar
Wang, K. et al. Archival single-cell genomics reveals persistent subclones during DCIS progression. Cell 186, 3968–3982.e15 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mossner, M. et al. Single cell multi-omic whole genome sequencing and chromatin accessibility profiling reveals genome-epigenome coevolution in colorectal cancer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.04.15.648959 (2025).
Clark, S. J. et al. Genome-wide base-resolution mapping of DNA methylation in single cells using single-cell bisulfite sequencing (scBS-seq). Nat. Protoc. 12, 534–547 (2017).
Google Scholar
Guo, H. et al. Profiling DNA methylome landscapes of mammalian cells with single-cell reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 10, 645–659 (2015).
Google Scholar
Bian, S. et al. Single-cell multiomics sequencing and analyses of human colorectal cancer. Science 362, 1060–1063 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chapman, A. R. et al. Single cell transcriptome amplification with MALBAC. PLoS ONE 10, e0120889 (2015).
Google Scholar
Picher, ÁJ. et al. TruePrime is a novel method for whole-genome amplification from single cells based on TthPrimPol. Nat. Commun. 7, 13296 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. Single-cell whole-genome analyses by linear amplification via transposon insertion (LIANTI). Science 356, 189–194 (2017).
Google Scholar
Czyż, Z. T. & Klein, C. A. Deterministic whole-genome amplification of single cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1347, 69–86 (2015).
Google Scholar
Li, W., Calder, R. B., Mar, J. C. & Vijg, J. Single-cell transcriptogenomics reveals transcriptional exclusion of ENU-mutated alleles. Mutat. Res. 772, 55–62 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lareau, C. A. et al. Droplet-based combinatorial indexing for massive-scale single-cell chromatin accessibility. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 916–924 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lareau, C. A. et al. Massively parallel single-cell mitochondrial DNA genotyping and chromatin profiling. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 451–461 (2021).
Google Scholar
Miller, T. E. et al. Mitochondrial variant enrichment from high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing resolves clonal populations. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1030–1034 (2022).
Google Scholar
Church, D. N. et al. DNA polymerase ε and δ exonuclease domain mutations in endometrial cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 2820–2828 (2013).
Google Scholar
Borgsmüller, N., Valecha, M., Kuipers, J., Beerenwinkel, N. & Posada, D. Single-cell phylogenies reveal changes in the evolutionary rate within cancer and healthy tissues. Cell Genom. 3, 100380 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gao, R. et al. Delineating copy number and clonal substructure in human tumors from single-cell transcriptomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 599–608 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., Jin, Z., Shi, Y. & Xi, R. Detecting copy-number alterations from single-cell chromatin sequencing data by AtaCNA. Cell Rep. Methods 5, 100939 (2025).
Google Scholar
Li, R. et al. Numbat-multiome: inferring copy number variations by combining RNA and chromatin accessibility information from single-cell data. Brief. Bioinform. 26, bbaf516 (2025).
Google Scholar
Pei, G. et al. Spatial mapping of transcriptomic plasticity in metastatic pancreatic cancer. Nature 642, 212–221 (2025).
Google Scholar
Dou, J. et al. Single-nucleotide variant calling in single-cell sequencing data with monopogen. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 803–812 (2024).
Google Scholar
Quinones-Valdez, G., Fu, T., Chan, T. W. & Xiao, X. scAllele: a versatile tool for the detection and analysis of variants in scRNA-seq. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn6398 (2022).
Google Scholar
