Steeg, P. S. Targeting metastasis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 201–218 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chaffer, C. L. & Weinberg, R. A. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 331, 1559–1564 (2011).
Google Scholar
Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178–196 (2014).
Google Scholar
Nieto, M. A., Huang, R. Y., Jackson, R. A. & Thiery, J. P. EMT: 2016. Cell 166, 21–45 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dongre, A. & Weinberg, R. A. New insights into the mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition and implications for cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 69–84 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tsai, J. H. & Yang, J. Epithelial–mesenchymal plasticity in carcinoma metastasis. Genes Dev. 27, 2192–2206 (2013).
Google Scholar
Batlle, E. et al. The transcription factor snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 84–89 (2000).
Google Scholar
Cano, A. et al. The transcription factor snail controls epithelial–mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 76–83 (2000).
Google Scholar
Du, C., Zhang, C., Hassan, S., Biswas, M. H. & Balaji, K. C. Protein kinase D1 suppresses epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition through phosphorylation of snail. Cancer Res. 70, 7810–7819 (2010).
Google Scholar
Moody, S. E. et al. The transcriptional repressor Snail promotes mammary tumor recurrence. Cancer Cell 8, 197–209 (2005).
Google Scholar
Wu, Y. & Zhou, B. P. Snail: more than EMT. Cell Adh. Migr. 4, 199–203 (2010).
Google Scholar
Yook, J. I. et al. A Wnt–Axin2–GSK3β cascade regulates Snail1 activity in breast cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 1398–1406 (2006).
Google Scholar
Zhou, B. P. et al. Dual regulation of Snail by GSK-3β-mediated phosphorylation in control of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 931–940 (2004).
Google Scholar
Haslehurst, A. M. et al. EMT transcription factors snail and slug directly contribute to cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 12, 91 (2012).
Google Scholar
Zhang, K. et al. Lats2 kinase potentiates Snail1 activity by promoting nuclear retention upon phosphorylation. EMBO J. 31, 29–43 (2012).
Google Scholar
Yang, Z. et al. Pak1 phosphorylation of snail, a master regulator of epithelial-to-mesenchyme transition, modulates snail’s subcellular localization and functions. Cancer Res. 65, 3179–3184 (2005).
Google Scholar
Viñas-Castells, R. et al. Nuclear ubiquitination by FBXL5 modulates Snail1 DNA binding and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 1079–1094 (2014).
Google Scholar
Jia, Z. et al. U-box ubiquitin ligase PPIL2 suppresses breast cancer invasion and metastasis by altering cell morphology and promoting SNAI1 ubiquitination and degradation. Cell Death Dis. 9, 63 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ma, X. et al. TRIM50 suppressed hepatocarcinoma progression through directly targeting SNAIL for ubiquitous degradation. Cell Death Dis. 9, 608 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wilkinson, K. D. The discovery of ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15280–15282 (2005).
Google Scholar
Zheng, N. & Shabek, N. Ubiquitin ligases: structure, function, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 129–157 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Zhao, J., Chen, D. & Wang, Y. E3 ubiquitin ligases: styles, structures and functions. Mol. Biomed. 2, 23 (2021).
Google Scholar
Komander, D. The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37, 937–953 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mevissen, T. E. T. & Komander, D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 159–192 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ikeda, F. & Dikic, I. Atypical ubiquitin chains: new molecular signals. ‘Protein modifications: beyond the usual suspects’ review series. EMBO Rep. 9, 536–542 (2008).
Google Scholar
Komander, D. & Rape, M. The ubiquitin code. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 81, 203–229 (2012).
Google Scholar
Fuseya, Y. & Iwai, K. Biochemistry, pathophysiology, and regulation of linear ubiquitination: intricate regulation by coordinated functions of the associated ligase and deubiquitinase. Cells 10, 2706 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jacobson, A. D. et al. The lysine 48 and lysine 63 ubiquitin conjugates are processed differently by the 26 s proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35485–35494 (2009).
Google Scholar
Miranda, M. & Sorkin, A. Regulation of receptors and transporters by ubiquitination: new insights into surprisingly similar mechanisms. Mol. Interv. 7, 157–167 (2007).
Google Scholar
Morris, J. R. & Solomon, E. BRCA1: BARD1 induces the formation of conjugated ubiquitin structures, dependent on K6 of ubiquitin, in cells during DNA replication and repair. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 807–817 (2004).
Google Scholar
Wickliffe, K. E., Williamson, A., Meyer, H. J., Kelly, A. & Rape, M. K11-linked ubiquitin chains as novel regulators of cell division. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 656–663 (2011).
Google Scholar
Shearer, R. F. et al. K27-linked ubiquitylation promotes p97 substrate processing and is essential for cell proliferation. EMBO J. 41, e110145 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gatti, M. et al. RNF168 promotes noncanonical K27 ubiquitination to signal DNA damage. Cell Rep. 10, 226–238 (2015).
Google Scholar
Castañeda, C. A. et al. Linkage via K27 bestows ubiquitin chains with unique properties among polyubiquitins. Structure 24, 423–436 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Engineering the orthogonal ubiquitin E1–E2 pairs for identification of K27 chain linkage substrates. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 283, 137837 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yu, Z. et al. Lys29-linkage of ASK1 by Skp1–Cullin 1–Fbxo21 ubiquitin ligase complex is required for antiviral innate response. eLife 5, e14087 (2016).
Huang, H. et al. K33-linked polyubiquitination of T cell receptor-ζ regulates proteolysis-independent T cell signaling. Immunity 33, 60–70 (2010).
Google Scholar
Aalto, A. et al. M1-linked ubiquitination facilitates NF-κB activation and survival during sterile inflammation. FEBS J. 289, 5180–5197 (2022).
Google Scholar
Fujiwara, T. et al. The BTRC gene, encoding a human F-box/WD40-repeat protein, maps to chromosome 10q24–q25. Genomics 58, 104–105 (1999).
Google Scholar
Wang, Z. et al. DEPTOR ubiquitination and destruction by SCF(β-TrCP). Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 303, E163–E169 (2012).
Google Scholar
Viñas-Castells, R. et al. The hypoxia-controlled FBXL14 ubiquitin ligase targets SNAIL1 for proteasome degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 3794–3805 (2010).
Google Scholar
Song, L. et al. LKB1 obliterates Snail stability and inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis in response to metformin treatment. Cancer Sci. 109, 1382–1392 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zheng, H. et al. PKD1 phosphorylation-dependent degradation of SNAIL by SCF-FBXO11 regulates epithelial–mesenchymal transition and metastasis. Cancer Cell 26, 358–373 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wu, W., Ding, H., Cao, J. & Zhang, W. FBXL5 inhibits metastasis of gastric cancer through suppressing Snail1. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 35, 1764–1772 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xu, M. et al. Atypical ubiquitin E3 ligase complex Skp1–Pam–Fbxo45 controls the core epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-inducing transcription factors. Oncotarget 6, 979–994 (2015).
Google Scholar
Xiao, G. et al. FBXW7 suppresses epithelial–mesenchymal transition and chemo-resistance of non-small-cell lung cancer cells by targeting snai1 for ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Cell Prolif. 51, e12473 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. FBW7 loss promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer through the stabilization of Snail protein. Cancer Lett. 419, 75–83 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zou, S. et al. FBXO31 suppresses gastric cancer EMT by targeting Snail1 for proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cancer Res. 16, 286–295 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sun, R. et al. FBXO22 possesses both protumorigenic and antimetastatic roles in breast cancer progression. Cancer Res. 78, 5274–5286 (2018).
Google Scholar
Okumura, F., Joo-Okumura, A., Nakatsukasa, K. & Kamura, T. The role of cullin 5-containing ubiquitin ligases. Cell Div. 11, 1 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. SPSB3 targets SNAIL for degradation in GSK-3β phosphorylation-dependent manner and regulates metastasis. Oncogene 37, 768–776 (2018).
Google Scholar
Jin, Y. et al. TRIM21 mediates ubiquitination of Snail and modulates epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 124, 846–853 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jin, Y. et al. Cancer-associated mutation abolishes the impact of TRIM21 on the invasion of breast cancer cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 142, 782–789 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ito, K. et al. MARCH2, a novel oncogene-regulated SNAIL E3 ligase, suppresses triple-negative breast cancer metastases. Cancer Res. Commun. 4, 946–957 (2024).
Google Scholar
Park, S. M. et al. Downregulation of CHIP promotes ovarian cancer metastasis by inducing Snail-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Mol. Oncol. 13, 1280–1295 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, X., De Geyter, C., Jia, Z., Peng, Y. & Zhang, H. HECTD1 regulates the expression of SNAIL: implications for epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Int. J. Oncol. 56, 1186–1198 (2020).
Google Scholar
Carmo-Fonseca, M. The contribution of nuclear compartmentalization to gene regulation. Cell 108, 513–521 (2002).
Google Scholar
Ko, H. et al. Nuclear localization signals of the E-cadherin transcriptional repressor Snail. Cells Tissues Organs 185, 66–72 (2007).
Google Scholar
Wójcik, C. & DeMartino, G. N. Intracellular localization of proteasomes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 35, 579–589 (2003).
Google Scholar
Jeon, Y. K. et al. Pellino-1 promotes lung carcinogenesis via the stabilization of Slug and Snail through K63-mediated polyubiquitination. Cell Death Differ. 24, 469–480 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lu, X. et al. Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) upregulates Snail expression and induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 7, 37177–37191 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chen, Y. et al. MDM2 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells. Br. J. Cancer 117, 1192–1201 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. miR-27b-3p/MARCH7 regulates invasion and metastasis of endometrial cancer cells through Snail-mediated pathway. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 51, 492–500 (2019).
Google Scholar
Xu, Y. et al. Role of CK1 in GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation and degradation of snail. Oncogene 29, 3124–3133 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mimoto, R. et al. DYRK2 controls the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in breast cancer by degrading Snail. Cancer Lett. 339, 214–225 (2013).
Google Scholar
Li, M. et al. Energy stress-activated AMPK phosphorylates Snail1 and suppresses its stability and oncogenic function. Cancer Lett. 595, 216987 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jung, H. Y. et al. Apical-basal polarity inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition and tumour metastasis by PAR-complex-mediated SNAI1 degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 359–371 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ito, K., Park, S. H., Nayak, A., Byerly, J. H. & Irie, H. Y. PTK6 inhibition suppresses metastases of triple-negative breast cancer via SNAIL-dependent E-cadherin regulation. Cancer Res. 76, 4406–4417 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liu, L. et al. PYK2 promotes cell proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in endometriosis by phosphorylating Snail1. Mol. Med. 31, 155 (2025).
Google Scholar
Xie, W. et al. IKBKE phosphorylates and stabilizes Snail to promote breast cancer invasion and metastasis. Cell Death Differ. 29, 1528–1540 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ryu, K. J. et al. p38 stabilizes Snail by suppressing DYRK2-mediated phosphorylation that is required for GSK3β–βTrCP-induced Snail degradation. Cancer Res. 79, 4135–4148 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. H. et al. ERK3 increases Snail protein stability by inhibiting FBXO11-mediated Snail ubiquitination. Cancers 16, 105 (2023).
Google Scholar
Qin, Z. Y. et al. BRD4 promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis through acetylation-dependent stabilization of Snail. Cancer Res. 79, 4869–4881 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, S. P. et al. p53 controls cancer cell invasion by inducing the MDM2-mediated degradation of Slug. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 694–704 (2009).
Google Scholar
Wu, Y. et al. Stabilization of Snail by NF-kB is required for inflammation-induced cell migration and invasion. Cancer Cell 15, 416–428 (2009).
Google Scholar
Eletr, Z. M. & Wilkinson, K. D. Regulation of proteolysis by human deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 114–128 (2014).
Google Scholar
Trulsson, F. et al. Deubiquitinating enzymes and the proteasome regulate preferential sets of ubiquitin substrates. Nat. Commun. 13, 2736 (2022).
Google Scholar
He, M. et al. The emerging role of deubiquitinating enzymes in genomic integrity, diseases, and therapeutics. Cell Biosci. 6, 62 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. & Wang, F. Post-translational modifications of deubiquitinating enzymes: expanding the ubiquitin code. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 685011 (2021).
Google Scholar
Clague, M. J. et al. Deubiquitylases from genes to organism. Physiol. Rev. 93, 1289–1315 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sowa, M. E., Bennett, E. J., Gygi, S. P. & Harper, J. W. Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape. Cell 138, 389–403 (2009).
Google Scholar
Amerik, A. Y. & Hochstrasser, M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695, 189–207 (2004).
Google Scholar
Clague, M. J., Urbé, S. & Komander, D. Breaking the chains: deubiquitylating enzyme specificity begets function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 338–352 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, L. et al. USP4 is regulated by AKT phosphorylation and directly deubiquitylates TGF-β type I receptor. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 717–726 (2012).
Google Scholar
Xiao, Z. et al. USP37 is a SNAI1 deubiquitinase. Am. J. Cancer Res. 9, 2749–2759 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hsu, S. K. et al. Deubiquitinating enzymes: potential regulators of the tumor microenvironment and implications for immune evasion. Cell Commun. Signal. 22, 259 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, X. et al. Roles of ubiquitination in the crosstalk between tumors and the tumor microenvironment. Int. J. Oncol. 61, 84 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liu, T. et al. CDK4/6-dependent activation of DUB3 regulates cancer metastasis through SNAIL1. Nat. Commun. 8, 13923 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hong, K. S. et al. MSK1 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis by increasing Snail protein stability through USP5-mediated Snail deubiquitination. Exp. Mol. Med. 57, 820–835 (2025).
Google Scholar
Kaushik, S. & Cuervo, A. M. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: a unique way to enter the lysosome world. Trends Cell Biol. 22, 407–417 (2012).
Google Scholar
Dice, J. F. Peptide sequences that target cytosolic proteins for lysosomal proteolysis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 305–309 (1990).
Google Scholar
Bandyopadhyay, U., Kaushik, S., Varticovski, L. & Cuervo, A. M. The chaperone-mediated autophagy receptor organizes in dynamic protein complexes at the lysosomal membrane. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 5747–5763 (2008).
Google Scholar
Cuervo, A. M. & Dice, J. F. A receptor for the selective uptake and degradation of proteins by lysosomes. Science 273, 501–503 (1996).
Google Scholar
Kaushik, S. & Cuervo, A. M. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 19, 365–381 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ryu, K. J. et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy modulates Snail protein stability: implications for breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer 23, 227 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kirchner, P. et al. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperone-mediated autophagy targeting motifs. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000301 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tang, Y. et al. Chaperone-mediated autophagy substrate proteins in cancer. Oncotarget 8, 51970–51985 (2017).
Google Scholar
